<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Shakespeare-Oxford Society</title>
	<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com</link>
	<description>Dedicated to Researching and Honoring the True Bard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 21:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.6" -->

	<item>
		<title>The Case for Oxford Revisited</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Ramon Jiménez In his recent biography of William Shakespeare, the critic Jonathan Bate writes: &#8220;Gathering what we can from his plays and poems: that is how we will write a biography that is true to him’ (xix). This statement acknowledges a widely recognized truth&#8212;that a writer’s work reflects his milieu, his experiences, his thoughts, and [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=971</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who Was Spencer&#8217;s EK: Was He the Seventeenth Earl of Oxford?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Nina Green Scholars have never satisfactorily identified the mysterious individual known only as E.K. who collaborated with Spenser on The Shepheardes Calender of 1579 and was the author of a lost commentary on Spenser&#8217;s Dreames. The suggestion that E.K. was Edward Kirke (1553-1613), a Cambridge contemporary of Spenser&#8217;s, seems to go nowhere through lack of [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=942</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hotwiring the Bard into Cyberspace: Insights into automated Forms of Stylistic Analysis Which Attempt to Address Elizabethan Authorship Questions</title>
		<description><![CDATA[W. Ron Hess There has long been controversy about who wrote what during the Elizabethan era because there was an extraordinary proclivity among Elizabethan authors to write anonymously or under pseudonyms, to collaborate, and to borrow (or to quote without attribution, what today we would call &#8220;to plagiarize&#8221;). Therefore, it is not surprising that this [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=929</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>William Byrd&#8217;s &#8220;Battle&#8221; and the Earl of Oxford</title>
		<description><![CDATA[by Sally Mosher Among close to three hundred pieces contained in the most famous keyboard manuscript of the English Renaissance, now known as The Fitzwilliam Virginal Book, is William Byrd&apos;s &#8220;The Earl of Oxford March&#8221; (Fitzwilliam II 402). The Oxford March has become well known to present day early music enthusiasts, and apparently was well [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=908</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Greene&#8217;s Groats-worth of Witte: Shakespeare&#8217;s Biography?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Frank Davis Few tracts from Shakespeare&apos;s time have generated more study, comment and controversy than Greenes Groats-worth of Witte, Bought with a Million of Repentance, Describing the follie of youth, the falshoode of makeshift flatterers, the miserie of the negligent, and mischiefes of deceiuing Courtezans. This curious but important work, posthumously published by Henry Chettle [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=888</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Shakespeare, Oxford, and &#8220;A Pedlar&#8221;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[James Fitzgerald You can always get a little more literature if you are willing to go a little closer into what has been left unsaid as unspeakable, just as you can always get a little more melon by going a little closer to the rind. Robert Frost The Oxford Book of English Verse, as one [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=866</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Mathematical Models of Stratfordian Persistence</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Charles Berney The year 1593 saw the publication of the first work attributed to &#8220;William Shake-speare, &#8221; the narrative poem Venus and Adonis. Subsequent years saw other publications with this attribution: another poem, a number of plays, a collection of sonnets, and finally, in 1623, a large volume entitled Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=798</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Newsletter Archive</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Back Issues of The Shakespeare-Oxford Society Newsletter 1965-1966 1967-1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=17</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>SHAKESPEARE’S KNOWLEDGE OF LAW </title>
		<description><![CDATA[A journey through the history of the argument Mark Andre Alexander Why may not that be the skull of a lawyer? Where be his quiddities now, his quillets, his cases, his tenures, and his tricks? why does he suffer this rude knave, now, to knock him about the sconce with a dirty shovel, and will [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=720</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Searching for the Oxfordian &#8220;Smoking Gun&#8221; in Elizabethan Letters</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul H. Altrocchi, M.D. I will find where truth is hid, though it were hid indeed within the center. Hamlet: Act II Scene 2 Oxfordian scholars should be commended for excellent research in the past twenty-five years&#8212;a very productive quarter century. Other Oxfordians have either been content to wait in the wings for the inevitable [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/?p=670</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>